Green Infrastructure Identification and Ranking Approach
The Greater Baltimore Wilderness Coalition identified a Regional Resilience Green Infrastructure Network. We integrated data from multiple sources and scales to identify an interconnected network of natural areas and other open spaces that provides a wide array of benefits to people and wildlife. This network includes the statewide Green Infrastructure hub-corridor network, but also county networks, regulated features, and other important natural resources. Areas of jurisdictional and priority overlap can highlight opportunities for collaboration and implementation, can help inform and support local plans, and help identify an appropriate level of protection for natural features that support long-term resiliency.
Local plans, regulations, policies, and programs can be used together to define and implement strategies for using green infrastructure to enhance community and regional resilience to coastal storms and climate change. Localities can use local comprehensive and functional plans to define goals, objectives, policies, and actions for using green infrastructure to enhance resilience. Regulatory tools allow localities to incentivize green infrastructure through the development review and approval processes, while other policy tools supplement adopted plans and regulations. Capital investments create opportunities to provide, enhance, or protect green infrastructure through direct public investments, and programmatic tools allow for investment in implementation. For more information on best practices for using green infrastructure to enhance resilience, please see the American Planning Association white paper entitled “Supporting a Regional Green Infrastructure Network through Local Policy and Action”.
We purposely cast a wide initial net, to identify all natural land cover and features that could maintain resilience and other ecosystem services, as well as opportunities for ecological restoration or creation of hybrid structures to improve resilience. From here, we ranked areas according to their relative importance for each of the five green infrastructure strategies. The Coalition convened a workshop for local planners on March 9, 2016 to solicit feedback on input data and weightings. Based on this feedback and data availability, we collected spatial layers, weighed them within each strategy, then combined them. Values vary from 0 to 100, with 100 being the top ranking areas and 0 the lowest.
Green Infrastructure Components and Ranking
Protect Natural Resources |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Not already protected
Not paved or a building
|
State-designated ecological significance |
Statewide Green Infrastructure Hub-Corridor Network
Targeted Ecological Areas
Significant for Biodiversity Conservation (BioNet Tiers 1-5)
Natural Heritage Areas
Wetlands of Special State Concern + 100 ft buffer
|
Watershed characteristics (DNR 12-digit watersheds) |
Percent forest cover (more forest preferred)
Percent impervious surface (<5%/5-10%/10-20%/>20%)
Blue Infrastructure Priority Watersheds
100 foot buffers of Stronghold Watershed streams, trout bearing streams, streams feeding municipal drinking water reservoirs, and Tier II High Quality Waters (Forests of Recognized Importance)
|
County/Local Scale Resource Features |
County green infrastructure plans (Howard, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and Anne Arundel)
Wetlands + 100-foot buffer
Surface waters + 100-foot buffer
1% (100 year) floodplains
2% (500 year) floodplains
Forest patches with at least 1 acre of interior
Blue Infrastructure Priority Watersheds
Forest patches delineated within Baltimore ≥10,000 ft2 and >90 ft wide
Forest corridors ranked by importance
Highly erodible soils
Steep slopes (>15%)
Baltimore City Habitat Protected Areas
Anne Arundel bog wetlands + 100 ft buffer
|
Population vulnerability |
Number of people/mi^2
% Population with income below poverty (12mo)
% Population of non-proficient English speakers
% Population <18 or >= 65 years of age
|
Ecosystem service values |
Stormwater Abatement
Groundwater Recharge
Air Quality
Sediment and Nutrient Capture
Carbon Sequestration
|
Enhance and Restore Tree Canopy |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Grass, shrub, or bare land cover (preferred); or paved surfaces other than buildings or roads (acceptable but less preferred)
Not an existing wetland
|
Land ownership |
Public ownership preferred
Privately owned with easement acceptable but less preferred
Privately owned with no easement least preferred
|
State-designated ecological significance |
Statewide Green Infrastructure Hub-Corridor Network
Targeted Ecological Areas
Significant for Biodiversity Conservation (BioNet Tiers 1-5)
Natural Heritage Areas
Wetlands of Special State Concern + 100 ft buffer
|
Watershed characteristics (DNR 12-digit watersheds) |
Percent forest cover (less forest preferred)
Percent impervious surface (5-20% preferred)
Blue Infrastructure Priority Watersheds
100 foot buffers of Stronghold Watershed streams, trout bearing streams, streams feeding municipal drinking water reservoirs, and Tier II High Quality Waters (Forests of Recognized Importance)
|
County/Local Scale Resource Features |
County green infrastructure plans (Howard, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and Anne Arundel)
Wetland buffers
Riparian buffers
1% (100 year) floodplains
2% (500 year) floodplains
Highly erodible soils
Steep slopes (>15%)
Baltimore City Habitat Protected Areas
Anne Arundel bog buffers
|
Population vulnerability |
% tree canopy in census tract
Number of people/mi^2
% Population with income below poverty (12mo)
% Population of non-proficient English speakers
% Population <18 or >= 65 years of age
|
Implement Multi-Benefit Green Stormwater Infrastructure |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Identified using EPA criteria for bioretention, constructed wetland, dry pond, grassed swale, infiltration basin, infiltration trench, porous pavement, sand filter (both surface and non-surface), vegetated filter strip, and/or wet pond
|
Land ownership |
Public ownership preferred
Privately owned with easement acceptable but less preferred
Privately owned with no easement least preferred
|
Potential for stormwater capture |
Area of impervious surface draining to the site
Presence/absence of existing BMPs
Presence of older development (less likely to have stormwater structures)
|
Watershed characteristics (DNR 12-digit watersheds) |
Percent forest cover (less forest preferred)
Percent impervious surface (>10% most preferred, 5-10% less preferred)
|
Nutrient loading (SPARROW output by NHD catchment) |
Non-point local nitrogen (TN) urban runoff
Non-point local phosphorus (TP) urban runoff
|
County/Local Scale Resource Features |
1% (100 year) floodplains
2% (500 year) floodplains
Highly erodible soils
Steep slopes (>15%)
|
Population vulnerability |
Number of people/mi^2
% Population with income below poverty (12mo)
% Population of non-proficient English speakers
% Population <18 or >= 65 years of age
|
Protect Critical Infrastructure |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Within floodplain or storm surge zone
Forested wetlands at least 120 ft wide preferred, then upland forest at least 120 ft wide, then other wetlands, then underwater grasses (SAV) with consistent coverage for at least 7 years from 2004-2014. There were no dunes or large oyster reefs in the study area.
Near (within 250 m) critical infrastructure
MEMA critical infrastructure sites (EOCs, fire stations, police stations, medical centers, schools)
Wastewater treatment plants
Power plants
Hurricane Evacuation Routes
Rail lines
|
State-designated ecological significance |
Statewide Green Infrastructure Hub-Corridor Network
Targeted Ecological Areas
Significant for Biodiversity Conservation (BioNet Tiers 1-5)
Natural Heritage Areas
Wetlands of Special State Concern + 100 ft buffer
|
Watershed characteristics (DNR 12-digit watersheds) |
Percent forest cover (more forest preferred)
Percent impervious surface (<5%/5-10%/10-20%/>20%)
Blue Infrastructure Priority Watersheds
100 foot buffers of Stronghold Watershed streams, trout bearing streams, streams feeding municipal drinking water reservoirs, and Tier II High Quality Waters (Forests of Recognized Importance)
|
County/Local Scale Resource Features |
County green infrastructure plans (Howard, Montgomery, Prince George’s, and Anne Arundel)
Wetlands + 100-foot buffer
Surface waters + 100-foot buffer
1% (100 year) floodplains
2% (500 year) floodplains
Forest patches with at least 1 acre of interior
Forest patches delineated within Baltimore ≥10,000 ft^2 and >90 ft wide
Forest corridors ranked by importance
Highly erodible soils
Steep slopes (>15%)
Baltimore City Habitat Protected Areas
Anne Arundel bog wetlands + 100 ft buffer
|
Population vulnerability |
Number of people/mi^2
% Population with income below poverty (12mo)
% Population of non-proficient English speakers
% Population <18 or >= 65 years of age
|
Ecosystem service values |
Stormwater Abatement
Groundwater Recharge
Air Quality
Sediment and Nutrient Capture
Carbon Sequestration
|
Defend the Coast: Preservation |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Not developed
Not already protected
Within coastal storm surge zone
Existing natural features within storm surge zone (forest, wetlands, or underwater grass)
|
State-designated Blue Infrastructure shoreline segments |
Blue Infrastructure Total rank, allocated to nearest natural features in storm surge zone
|
Maryland Coastal Resiliency Assessment |
Habitat role in hazard risk reduction (High/Moderate/Low/None)
|
Defend the Coast: Restoration |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Not developed
Within coastal storm surge zone
|
State-designated Blue Infrastructure shoreline segments |
Blue Infrastructure Total rank, allocated to nearest natural features in storm surge zone
|
Maryland Coastal Resiliency Assessment |
Shoreline hazard index
|
Defend the Coast: Enhancement |
|
---|---|
Mandatory criteria |
Grass, bare earth, or open water the most appropriate, followed by paved surfaces other than buildings and roads.
Within coastal storm surge zone
|
State-designated Blue Infrastructure shoreline segments |
Blue Infrastructure Total rank, allocated to nearest natural features in storm surge zone
|
Maryland Coastal Resiliency Assessment |
Shoreline hazard index
|